Discuție:Neoliberalism

Curios . Am Neloliberalismul de Stefan Zeletin. Si stiti ce scrie? Scrie ca interventia statului este de dorit!!

Da, iar Manoilescu nu a sustinut neoliberalismul ci o forma de corporatism , adica o doctrina opunsa neoliberalismului.Sargon (discuție) 30 noiembrie 2013 22:38 (EET) Sargon 30.11.2013 - 22:30

Liberalismul este identic cu libertarianismul.

In text scrie astfel: " Câteodată, liberalismul este considerat egal, în mod eronat, cu libertarianismul ". Prima eroare este ca nu apare nicio sursa. A doua eroare consta in faptul ca libertarianismul este identic cu liberalismul in sensul clasic al termenului. Iata articolul din 1955 care a introdus in SUA termenul "libertarianism":

<< Many of us call ourselves “liberals.” And it is true that the word “liberal” once described persons who respected the individual and feared the use of mass compulsions. But the leftists have now corrupted that once-proud term to identify themselves and their program of more government ownership of property and more controls over persons. As a result, those of us who believe in freedom must explain that when we call ourselves liberals, we mean liberals in the uncorrupted classical sense. At best, this is awkward and subject to misunderstanding.

Here is a suggestion: Let those of us who love liberty trade-mark and reserve for our own use the good and honorable word “libertarian.” >>

Sursa: http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/who-is-a-libertarian#axzz2mAA8Q3ci .Sargon (discuție) 30 noiembrie 2013 22:38 (EET) Sargon 30.11.2013 - 22:37